7^thGlobal Dentists and Pediatric Dentistry Annual meeting March 30-31, 2016 Valencia, Spain

Biography:

Abstract:

Because of functional reasons and relationship with burden of disease, the oral health is so important.Childhood and adolescence are the best time to learn and know how to live healthy and also keep it on during the life. It is exactly the school time. Availability and number of schools as a comprehensive educational setting around the world, make them to a suitable place to oral health promotion.rn“Health Promoting Schools” (HPS) program is an useful program to guide supportive practices in promoting the development of healthy behaviors in students.rnThe World Health Organization's (WHO's) HPS program framework is flawless as a general guide.The DOCUMENT ELEVEN (Oral Health Promotion: An Essential Element of a Health-Promoting School) of WHO, is the suitable guide to integrate of “oral interventions” in HPS program. But as it is mentioned in “Local Action Creating” (publication of WHO) HPS program from country to country, even within different regions and communities of one country, schools have distinct strengths and needs.According to distinct strengths and needs of schools in Alborz, we integrate oral interventions in the HPS program via the most effective manner so the program was customized to Alborz students.rnSo, the purpose of this study was to know:rnIs the integration of oral interventions in the HPS program, theoretically cost-benefit per each student or not? rnMethod:rn We searched the following electronic databases OVID, MEDLINE, EMBASE, IRCTC, CINAHL, Biblio Map, IBSC, Global Health Database, SIGLE, Australian Education Index, British Education Index, Database of Education Research, and also relevant libraries, websites, and other relevant articles to find how can we integrate the “oral interventions” in HPS program and cost-benefit analysis of implementation of program .Obtained information via the mentioned sources, presented to experts and stakeholders. Brainstorming, nominal group technique, the Delphi method and tri-angulation technique were employed to achieve the most correct answers. After integration of oral interventions in the HPS program, we implement the cost-benefit analysis per each student. rn Result:rn Our cost-benefit analysis showed that the implementation of integrated package of oral health interventions in HPS program that was customized and localized for Iran, Alborz, was more beneficial in reducing of 1 unit in DMFT of Alborz students. rnConclusion:rnThe localized and customized package was more beneficial to influencing on oral health status and promotion and it have to be a general program for schools.rn

Biography:

Nora is an egyptian dentist, who graduated from the University of Ain Shams with a bachelor degree in dentistry in 2007. Nora completed a 3 years residency period at Al-Demerdash hospital, Ain Shams University. She also finished a 3 years training course in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. She earned a master degree in Oral and Maxillofacial surgery from the University of Cairo in 2015. For her master`s thesis Nora did a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of socket preservation using Prehydrated Collagenated Cortico-Cancellous Xenograft (Osteobiol®) in posterior maxillary area in close proximity to

Abstract:

The current study was conducted for a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of socket preservation using Prehydrated Collagenated Cortico-Cancellous Equine Xenograft (Osteobiol®) in posterior maxillary area in close proximity to rnmaxillary sinus, compared to normal socket healing. 22 posterior maxillary extraction sites, indicated for socket preservation and implant placement were included in this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups; 1-Study group: in which the extraction socket was filled with the bone graft. 2-Control group: in which the extraction socket was left to heal without bone grafting. All patients underwent medical, clinical and radiographic preoperative evaluation. The target tooth was extracted atraumatically and the alveolar ridge was preserved using Osteobiol Putty® bone graft material in the study group cases. All patients underwent follow up for 9 months. During this period they were regularly examined clinically to monitor healing and assess for any complications. Radiographic follow up was achieved using CBCT scanning immediately postoperative, at 3 months and at 9 months post-operatively. The current study measured 3 parameters: sinus pneumatization, ridge height and width. Nine months after the first operative phase, bone core biopsy was taken from all cases of both groups, followed by implant placement. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the retrieved biopsies was performed to assess for the amount, type, percentage of new bone formation as well as the osteoblastic/osteoclastic ratio. No major intraoperative or postoperative clinical complications were encountered in both groups. Radiographically; sinus pneumatization, alveolar ridge height and width loss were concluded to be statistically more pronounced in the non grafted sockets than in the grafted ones. Histologic and histomorphometric examination of the bone biopsies revealed new bone formation in both groups. Morphometric analysis showed that the mean area fraction of the total bone matrix and the lamellar bone area fraction were significantly higher in the study group than the control group. The osteoblastic/osteoclastic ratio was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The current study approved the space-maintaining activity of the used graft material (heterologous cortico-cancelous bone mix 80% and type I collagen 20%). Osteobiol succeeded in better preservation of alveolar bone dimensions than the spontaneous normal socket healing. The used grafting material could be successfully utilized for socket preservation in posterior maxilla.rn